Planning appeal decision
Royal Berkshire Shooting School, Tomb Farm, Ashampstead, RG8 8SD
Planning appeal 6005876 at Royal Berkshire Shooting School, Tomb Farm, Ashampstead, RG8 8SD (West Berkshire) was dismissed on 26 June 2026 by Inspector N Bromley, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the setting of the Grade II listed buildings comprising Tomb Farmhouse and Nobes Tomb.
Proposed hospitality use and change in opening hours of Lodge Building, extension of shooting area, retention of temporary facilities building, and increased use of existing marquee
- Authority
- West Berkshire
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- leisure-sport
- Inspector
- N Bromley
- Postcode
- RG8 8SD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the setting of the Grade II listed buildings comprising Tomb Farmhouse and Nobes Tomb
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring properties in respect of noise
- whether or not the proposed development would promote sustainable transport choices and / or lead to highways safety implications
- whether the proposal would conserve and enhance the natural and scenic beauty of the North Wessex Downs National Landscape (NWDNL), and if it does not, whether any harm is outweighed by exceptional circumstances, and it can be demonstrated that the proposal is in the public interest
What decided it
The cumulative harm to the setting of Grade II listed buildings, unacceptable noise impacts from the additional shooting valley, unacceptable highways safety implications from increased traffic on unsuitable rural roads, and failure to conserve and enhance the North Wessex Downs National Landscape without exceptional circumstances or public interest justification, collectively outweighed the modest economic benefits of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP9Policy SP2Policy DM5Policy SP19Policy DM42Policy DM35
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 85Paragraph 89Paragraph 190Paragraph 212Paragraph 213Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Berkshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed19 June 202660052108 High Street, Pangbourne, Reading, RG8 7AB
- Allowed26 March 20263367152Land Adjacent To M4, Membury Airfield, Lambourn Woodlands, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7TJ
- Dismissed12 December 202533661659 Clay Close, Tilehurst, Reading , West Berkshire , RG31 5QB
- Dismissed21 August 20253359935Kennet Centre, Newbury, RG14 5EN
- Allowed10 July 20253356688Land South of Sandhill, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®