Planning appeal decision
Land South of Sandhill, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
Planning appeal 3356688 at Land South of Sandhill, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU (West Berkshire District Council) was allowed on 10 July 2025 by Inspector Chamberlain G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, especially the North Wessex Downs National Landscape (NL).
‘Change of use of land for the formation of 5 Gypsy/Traveller pitches comprising of 1 mobile home, 1 touring caravan, and 1 utility building per pitch ’
- Authority
- West Berkshire District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Chamberlain G
- Postcode
- RG18 9XU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, especially the North Wessex Downs National Landscape (NL)
- The weight to be attached to intentional unauthorised development (IUD)
- Whether in a planning balance any harmful effects arising from the proposal would be outweighed by other considerations
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year supply of pitches, combined with the absence of alternative accommodation for the travellers, meant the limited landscape harm did not provide a strong reason to withhold permission under the tilted balance.
the advantages of the proposal, including the contribution to pitch supply, the absence of alternatives and wider sustainability benefits, outweighed the 'great weight' afforded to the limited harm to the National Landscape, and the collective adverse impacts including IUD did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP2Policy SP7Policy SP8Policy DM20Policy DM1Policy DM15Policy HER2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 189
- Judgments
- Monkhill Ltd v SSHCLG [2021]; R (Morris) v Wealden District Council [2014] EWHC 4081 (Admin
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Berkshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed29 September 20266012621Land South of Sandhill, Hampstead Norreys Road, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
- Dismissed28 September 2026600935976 Mallard Way, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4US
- Dismissed4 September 20266009718Vyners Estate,, Mill Lane, Tidmarsh, Reading, RG8 8EB
- Allowed2 September 20266009448Compounds A, A1, And A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW
- Dismissed26 June 20266005876Royal Berkshire Shooting School, Tomb Farm, Ashampstead, RG8 8SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®