Planning appeal decision
Vyners Estate,, Mill Lane, Tidmarsh, Reading, RG8 8EB
Planning appeal 6009718 at Vyners Estate,, Mill Lane, Tidmarsh, Reading, RG8 8EB (West Berkshire) was dismissed on 4 September 2026 by Inspector E Everitt, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the countryside.
Residential development for 3 dwellings
- Authority
- West Berkshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- E Everitt
- Postcode
- RG8 8EB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be suitably located having regard to relevant development plan policies concerning the countryside
- whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building known as Barn at Keepers Cottage
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- the effect of the proposed development on flood risk
- whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for drainage
- whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for climate change mitigation and adaptation and energy efficiency
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including whether the development would conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the North Wessex Downs National Landscape
- whether the proposed development makes adequate provision regarding land contamination
What decided it
The proposal fails to preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building and conflicts with development plan policies on countryside development and accessibility, and these conflicts are not outweighed by the limited housing and amenity benefits.
The public benefits of housing delivery (substantial weight tempered by limited scale) and replacement of commercial use with residential use (moderate weight) do not outweigh the harm to the setting of Barn at Keepers Cottage (considerable importance and weight) and the conflicts with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP1Policy SP3Policy DM1Policy SP19Policy SP6Policy DM7Policy SP5Policy DM4Policy DM5Policy SP2Policy SP7Policy SP8Policy SP9Policy DM10
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Berkshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 September 20266012621Land South of Sandhill, Hampstead Norreys Road, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
- Dismissed28 September 2026600935976 Mallard Way, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4US
- Allowed2 September 20266009448Compounds A, A1, And A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW
- Dismissed15 June 20266007181Whynot, Eastbury, RG17 7JP
- Allowed26 March 20263367152Land Adjacent To M4, Membury Airfield, Lambourn Woodlands, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7TJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®