Planning appeal decision
Compounds A, A1, and A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW
- Authority
- West Berkshire
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- employment-industrial
- Postcode
- RG7 4PW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the removal of condition 6 on flood risk and water quality
- the effect of the removal of conditions 8 and 9 on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the removal of conditions 8 and 9 on the living conditions of the occupiers of 48-49 Paices Hill
What decided it
The removal of condition 6 (drainage) was necessary to manage flood risk and water quality in accordance with Policy SP6, whereas condition 9 (landscaping) was not necessary as there was no evidence of threat to existing vegetation and additional planting was not proportionate for a change of use development.
Framework references: DP3, N3
Plan policies cited: Policy SP6, Policy SP7, Policy SP8, Policy SP10, Policy DM5, Policy DM30
Judgments cited: North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1993] 65 P. & C.R. 137
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®