Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 September 20266009448

Compounds A, A1, and A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW

Authority
West Berkshire
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
employment-industrial
Postcode
RG7 4PW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the removal of condition 6 on flood risk and water quality
  • the effect of the removal of conditions 8 and 9 on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the removal of conditions 8 and 9 on the living conditions of the occupiers of 48-49 Paices Hill

What decided it

The removal of condition 6 (drainage) was necessary to manage flood risk and water quality in accordance with Policy SP6, whereas condition 9 (landscaping) was not necessary as there was no evidence of threat to existing vegetation and additional planting was not proportionate for a change of use development.

Framework references: DP3, N3

Plan policies cited: Policy SP6, Policy SP7, Policy SP8, Policy SP10, Policy DM5, Policy DM30

Judgments cited: North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1993] 65 P. & C.R. 137

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.