Planning appeal decision
Compounds A, A1, And A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW
Planning appeal 6009448 at Compounds A, A1, And A4, Youngs Industrial Estate, Paices Hill, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PW (West Berkshire) was allowed on 2 September 2026 by Inspector E Everitt, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the removal of condition 6 on flood risk and water quality.
Retrospective use of land for storage and distribution (Use Class B8)
- Authority
- West Berkshire
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- employment-industrial
- Inspector
- E Everitt
- Postcode
- RG7 4PW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the removal of condition 6 on flood risk and water quality
- the effect of the removal of conditions 8 and 9 on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the removal of conditions 8 and 9 on the living conditions of the occupiers of 48-49 Paices Hill
What decided it
The removal of condition 6 (drainage) was necessary to manage flood risk and water quality in accordance with Policy SP6, whereas condition 9 (landscaping) was not necessary as there was no evidence of threat to existing vegetation and additional planting was not proportionate for a change of use development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP6Policy SP7Policy SP8Policy SP10Policy DM5Policy DM30
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy DP3Policy N3
- Judgments
- North Wiltshire District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1993] 65 P. & C.R. 137
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Berkshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 September 20266012621Land South of Sandhill, Hampstead Norreys Road, Hermitage, Thatcham, RG18 9XU
- Dismissed28 September 2026600935976 Mallard Way, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4US
- Dismissed4 September 20266009718Vyners Estate,, Mill Lane, Tidmarsh, Reading, RG8 8EB
- Dismissed15 June 20266007181Whynot, Eastbury, RG17 7JP
- Allowed26 March 20263367152Land Adjacent To M4, Membury Airfield, Lambourn Woodlands, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7TJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®