Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 March 20243329947

Land Lying To The East Of Hartfield Avenue And Fronting Onto, Barnet Lane, Elstree, Hertfordshire, WD6 3JB

Residential development of up to 74 dwellings, with associated landscaping, amenity space, Self-Build plots, sustainable urban drainage (SuDs), and associated works. (Outline Application to include Access, with all other matters Reserved)’3

Authority
Hertsmere Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Rose D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes (purposes a) – c) as defined in the Framework).
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
  • The effect of the proposal on the grassland habitat within the Elstree Tunnel Local Wildlife Site and the appropriateness of the proposed measures to secure biodiversity net gain.
  • The degree and implications of the shortfall in the five-year housing land supply, including consideration of affordable housing and self-build plots.
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.

What decided it

The severe and worsening shortfall in the Council's five-year housing land supply, combined with the very substantial weight given to market and affordable housing delivery, clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt and other harm, amounting to very special circumstances.

The very substantial weight given to market and affordable housing, together with significant weight to self-build provision and moderate weight to biodiversity net gain and economic benefits, clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, openness and purposes) and moderate landscape/visual harm, amounting to very special circumstances justifying the development.

Framework references: 11, 57, 63, 85, 114, 124, 142, 152, 153, 180, 186

Plan policies cited: Policy CS13, Policy CS4, Policy CS12, Policy CS26, Policy SP1, Policy SP2, Policy SADM10, Policy SADM11

Judgments cited: Saredon Aggregates judgement [2023] EWHC 2795

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.