Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 June 20243330518

11 Tavistock Road, Edgware, HA8 6DF

Planning appeal 3330518 at 11 Tavistock Road, Edgware, HA8 6DF (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 12 June 2024 by Inspector Andrews M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings.

Erection of infill extension; a part one part two storey side extension; loft conversion; the conversion of the property to create three flats; (2 x 1- bed 2 person flats and 1 x 2-bed three person flats) and associated amenity, parking and cycle and refuse storage

Authority
London Borough of Harrow
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Andrews M
Postcode
HA8 6DF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings
  • the living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed flats and the occupiers of No. 9 Tavistock Road

What decided it

The cumulative impact of the proposed extensions would result in excessive development on too small a site, creating an unacceptably harmful impact on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings in conflict with local and national design policies.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D1Policy D6Policy D11Policy T5Policy CS1.BPolicy DM1Policy DM23Policy DM26Policy DM42Policy DM45Policy D7Policy D8Policy D10Policy DM27
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

588 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266006380
    Thrale Farm, 1 Oxhey Lane, Pinner, HA3 6SX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266011336
    52 Durley Avenue, Pinner, HA5 1JH
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011223
    30 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, HA3 8PQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008284
    24 Uxbridge Road, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.