Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 January 20243330638

Flat 3, 24 Beaconsfield Street, Hartlepool, Cleveland, TS24 0NX

replacement of 4 timber windows for 4 uPVC windows (2 at the front, 1 at the side, 1 at the back)

Authority
Hartlepool Borough Council *
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the character or appearance of the Headland Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced

What decided it

The installed uPVC windows constitute a harmful change to the building and the Headland Conservation Area that fails to preserve or enhance its character and appearance, contrary to statutory requirements and the development plan, and the private benefits do not outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 12, 16

Plan policies cited: Policy HE1, Policy HE3, Policy HE7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.