Planning appeal decision
Flat 3, 24 Beaconsfield Street, Hartlepool, Cleveland, TS24 0NX
replacement of 4 timber windows for 4 uPVC windows (2 at the front, 1 at the side, 1 at the back)
- Authority
- Hartlepool Borough Council *
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Caines A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the character or appearance of the Headland Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced
What decided it
The installed uPVC windows constitute a harmful change to the building and the Headland Conservation Area that fails to preserve or enhance its character and appearance, contrary to statutory requirements and the development plan, and the private benefits do not outweigh this harm.
Framework references: 12, 16
Plan policies cited: Policy HE1, Policy HE3, Policy HE7
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®