Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 June 20243330718

Rear of 67 Station Road, Sidcup, DA15 7DR

Planning appeal 3330718 at Rear of 67 Station Road, Sidcup, DA15 7DR (London Borough of Bexley) was dismissed on 14 June 2024 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of two-storey detached dwelling. Appeal B: APP/D5120/W/23/3330718 Rear of 67 Station Road, Sidcup, Bexley DA15 7DR

Authority
London Borough of Bexley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Leonard S
Postcode
DA15 7DR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 63 and 65 Station Road, with particular regard to privacy impacts
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 67 Station Road, with particular regard to outdoor living space
  • Whether the proposal provides adequate evidence in respect of Fire Safety

What decided it

The material harm to the character and appearance of the area through incongruous rear-land development conflicting with the established perimeter building layout, combined with unmitigated privacy impacts on neighbouring properties and inadequate fire safety evidence, outweighed the modest housing and economic benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP11Policy DP21Policy D4Policy G7Policy D12Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 70Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 136

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

182 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Bexley

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266013098
    Rear Of 110-112 Belvedere Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4PF
  2. Allowed19 October 20266010781
    126 Crayford Road, Crayford, Dartford, DA1 4ES
  3. Allowed12 October 20266004983
    Land to the Rear of No. 48 Sidcup High Street, Bexley, DA14 6EH
  4. Allowed2 October 20266012368
    35 Cumberland Drive, Bexleyheath, DA7 5LA
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266012819
    17 Percy Road, Bexleyheath, DA7 4DZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.