Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 January 20243330733

London Underground Ltd, White City Station Wood Lane, London, W12 7RH

Planning appeal 3330733 at London Underground Ltd, White City Station Wood Lane, London, W12 7RH (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 26 January 2024 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the visual amenity of the area, with reference to the Wood Lane Conservation Area and the setting of the Grade II listed Television Centre and the White City Underground Station, a locally listed building of architectural merit.

one double sided freestanding LED digital advertisement display

Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Callister V
Postcode
W12 7RH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the visual amenity of the area, with reference to the Wood Lane Conservation Area and the setting of the Grade II listed Television Centre and the White City Underground Station, a locally listed building of architectural merit

What decided it

The substantial harm to visual amenity and the setting of heritage assets, combined with the incongruous prominence of the illuminated display within a visually restrained local context, outweighed the limited and notional environmental benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DC1Policy DC8Policy DC9Policy WCRAPolicy WCRA1Policy HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 141Paragraph 208Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

711 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266010445
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266010443
    Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
  3. Allowed21 August 20266007449
    Roman Road, Shepherds Bush Green, Opposite 19, London, W12 8PH
  4. Allowed21 August 20266007445
    Roman Road, Shepherds Bush Green, Opposite 19, London, W12 8PH
  5. Allowed4 August 20266004997
    84 North End Road, London, W14 9ES

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.