Planning appeal decision
London Underground Ltd, White City Station Wood Lane, London, W12 7RH
Planning appeal 3330733 at London Underground Ltd, White City Station Wood Lane, London, W12 7RH (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 26 January 2024 by Inspector Callister V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the visual amenity of the area, with reference to the Wood Lane Conservation Area and the setting of the Grade II listed Television Centre and the White City Underground Station, a locally listed building of architectural merit.
one double sided freestanding LED digital advertisement display
- Appeal type
- commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- advertisement · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Callister V
- Postcode
- W12 7RH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the visual amenity of the area, with reference to the Wood Lane Conservation Area and the setting of the Grade II listed Television Centre and the White City Underground Station, a locally listed building of architectural merit
What decided it
The substantial harm to visual amenity and the setting of heritage assets, combined with the incongruous prominence of the illuminated display within a visually restrained local context, outweighed the limited and notional environmental benefits of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DC1Policy DC8Policy DC9Policy WCRAPolicy WCRA1Policy HC1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 141Paragraph 208Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed1 October 20266010445Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Dismissed1 October 20266010443Pavement Outside 498-504 Fulham Road, London, SW6 5NH
- Allowed21 August 20266007449Roman Road, Shepherds Bush Green, Opposite 19, London, W12 8PH
- Allowed21 August 20266007445Roman Road, Shepherds Bush Green, Opposite 19, London, W12 8PH
- Allowed4 August 2026600499784 North End Road, London, W14 9ES
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®