Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 May 20243331088

Woodview, Oak Tree Court, Nottingham/London, United Kingdom, NG12 4HJ

Planning appeal 3331088 at Woodview, Oak Tree Court, Nottingham/London, United Kingdom, NG12 4HJ (Rushcliffe Borough Council) was dismissed on 29 May 2024 by Inspector Rafiq F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

to erect a 10m x 8m greenhouse and extend existing wooden outbuilding by 2m

Authority
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Change of use
Inspector
Rafiq F
Postcode
NG12 4HJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm from inappropriate development was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight of the sustainability benefits, failing to establish very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 21 of the Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 152Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rushcliffe

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed9 June 20266004544
    137 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5PJ
  2. Allowed1 June 20266005540
    200 Melton Road, Stanton on the Wolds, NG12 5BP
  3. Allowed5 May 20266006419
    78 Cropwell Road, Radcliffe On Trent, Nottinghamshire, NG12 2JG
  4. Notice varied and upheld8 September 20253337651
    Riverside, Fairham Brook Lane, Bunny, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG11 0GB
  5. Allowed16 June 20253358676
    Land North West of Lammas Farm, Kneeton Road, East Bridgford, Nottinghamshire, NG13 8PJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.