Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 November 20243331161

Highfield House Wraxall Hill, Wraxall, Bristol, BS48 1NA

Planning appeal 3331161 at Highfield House Wraxall Hill, Wraxall, Bristol, BS48 1NA (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 7 November 2024 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

described on the application form as, “Resiting of 1no. dwelling (approved under application 21/P/1197/CQA) to location of agricultural barn (approved under application 20/P/2785/AGA) and resiting of the agricultural barn to location of the approved 1no. dwelling”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
BS48 1NA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having particular regard to the spatial strategy in the development plan and the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduction in openness, combined with harm to character and appearance and unsuitability of location, are not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the fallback position and housing land supply position, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

The substantial harms to the Green Belt (inappropriateness and loss of openness) and moderate harm to character and appearance, together with very little weight to conflict with spatial strategy policies, substantially outweigh the limited benefits of one additional dwelling, the fallback position (given only moderate weight), and energy efficiency gains, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM12Policy CS14Policy CS33Policy CS5Policy CS12Policy DM10Policy DM32Policy CS4Policy CS9Policy DM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 124Paragraph 135Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
Judgments
Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Somerset Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266011867
    Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007743
    Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
  3. Dismissed8 June 20266006387
    Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
  4. Dismissed11 November 20253366314
    Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
  5. Dismissed26 September 20253365815
    Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.