Planning appeal decision
Land South of Burford Road, Minster Lovell, Oxfordshire, OX29 0BB
Planning appeal 3331279 at Land South of Burford Road, Minster Lovell, Oxfordshire, OX29 0BB (West Oxfordshire District Council) was allowed on 28 March 2024 by Inspector Ward K, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the Council can demonstrate a five year supply of housing land.
the development of up to 134 dwellings (Use Class C3) including means of access into the site (not internal roads) and associated highway works, with all other matters (relating to appearance, landscaping, scale and layout) reserved
- Authority
- West Oxfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Ward K
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council can demonstrate a five year supply of housing land
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the scale and location of the proposed development is appropriate in principle in terms of the policy approach to housing development in Minster Lovell and accessibility to services and facilities
- The effect of the proposed development on flood risk and drainage
- Whether the proposed development would make adequate provision towards local infrastructure requirements, affordable and self-build housing needs and biodiversity net gain
- Whether the policies which are most important for determining the application are out of date due to a lack of a five year supply of housing land or any other reason and if so, would any adverse impacts of the proposed development significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five year housing land supply engaged the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11(d)ii, and the substantial housing benefits were found to outweigh the limited landscape harm and development plan conflict.
The limited, localised landscape harm and conflict with the development plan as a whole did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the substantial benefits of housing delivery (including affordable and self-build housing) and moderate sustainability/economic benefits, so the presumption in favour of sustainable development applied and permission was granted.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy OS2Policy OS4Policy EH2Policy H1Policy H2Policy H3Policy H5Policy T1Policy T3Policy OS5Policy EH3Policy EH4Policy EH5Policy CA1Policy EW2Policy EW4Policy EW5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Oxfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed13 October 20266004776Land South of Ramsden, Akeman Street, Ramsden, OX7 3AY
- Allowed9 September 20266007705Forge Garage, Church Road, Churchill, OX7 6NJ
- Dismissed30 June 20266005283Land West of The Nursery, 6 Oxford Road, Eynsham, OX29 4HG
- Dismissed5 May 20266002714Land at Main Road, Alvescot, West Oxfordshire, OX18 2PU
- Dismissed28 April 20266001930Land at Drive to Butlers Farm Road, Alvescot, Alvescot, Oxfordshire, OX18 2PU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®