Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 September 20243331479

Lobbington Cottage Chew Lane, Chew Stoke, BRISTOL, BS40 8UE

Change of use of land from agricultural land to garden land and erection of timber fencing (Retrospective) resubmission of 22/05135/FUL

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Walker K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on best and most versatile agricultural land
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness and rural character cannot be justified by the modest benefits claimed, as these do not clearly outweigh the harm required by paragraph 153 of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 143, 153, 154, 155

Plan policies cited: Policy CP8, Policy HDE1, Policy GB1, Policy NE2B, Policy NE2, Policy RE5, Policy D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.