Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 January 20243331535

43 Beaconsfield Road, Bradford, BD14 6LQ

described on the application form as ‘proposed extensions and alterations to dwelling

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area
  • If it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and character, and the limited weight given to other considerations does not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.

Framework references: 143, 152, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DS3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.