Planning appeal decision
24 Malvern Crescent, Riddlesden, Keighley, West Yorkshire, BD20 5DL
Planning appeal 3331627 at 24 Malvern Crescent, Riddlesden, Keighley, West Yorkshire, BD20 5DL (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 25 January 2024 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
a 2 storey detached dwelling with associated parking and landscaping
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Caines A
- Postcode
- BD20 5DL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- parking stress and other road user convenience
- biodiversity, including the effect on the integrity of designated sites of nature conservation
What decided it
The absence of a completed planning obligation to secure mitigation for the likely significant effect on the integrity of the South Pennine Moors SPA and SAC, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and parking provision, outweighed the moderate benefits of providing a new dwelling.
The moderate benefits of providing a new home and supporting housing delivery were outweighed by significant conflict with the development plan relating to character and appearance, parking provision, and the integrity of designated nature conservation sites, with the presumption in favour of sustainable development disapplied due to the SPA/SAC integrity issue.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS1Policy DS3Policy DS4Policy TR2Policy SC8Policy EN2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 September 2026601067225-27 Kensington Street, Bradford, BD8 9LZ
- Dismissed11 August 202660047491 Corn Mill Fold, Bradford, BD6 2HQ
- Dismissed21 July 2026600847895 Lilycroft Road, Bradford, BD9 5AH
- Dismissed27 May 202660028741, Chapel Street, Bradford, BD5 0LF
- Dismissed7 April 2026600493896 Avondale Road, Shipley, West Yorkshire, BD18 4QY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®