Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 January 20243331627

24 Malvern Crescent, Riddlesden, KEIGHLEY, West Yorkshire, BD20 5DL

a 2 storey detached dwelling with associated parking and landscaping

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • parking stress and other road user convenience
  • biodiversity, including the effect on the integrity of designated sites of nature conservation

What decided it

The absence of a completed planning obligation to secure mitigation for the likely significant effect on the integrity of the South Pennine Moors SPA and SAC, combined with significant harm to character and appearance and parking provision, outweighed the moderate benefits of providing a new dwelling.

The moderate benefits of providing a new home and supporting housing delivery were outweighed by significant conflict with the development plan relating to character and appearance, parking provision, and the integrity of designated nature conservation sites, with the presumption in favour of sustainable development disapplied due to the SPA/SAC integrity issue.

Framework references: 11, 135, 15

Plan policies cited: Policy DS1, Policy DS3, Policy DS4, Policy TR2, Policy SC8, Policy EN2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.