Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 August 20243332082

Marsons Croft, Station Road, Rotherfield, East Sussex, TN6 3HU

Planning appeal 3332082 at Marsons Croft, Station Road, Rotherfield, East Sussex, TN6 3HU (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 6 August 2024 by Inspector Dyer I, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building known as Marston's Croft and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses.

single storey rear extension to replace 1930’s extension

Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Dyer I
Postcode
TN6 3HU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building known as Marston's Croft and any of the features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses

What decided it

The proposal would result in less than substantial but considerable harm to the special interest of the listed building through loss of historic fabric, weakening of the catslide roof form's legibility, and alteration of historic room layouts, with no sufficient public benefits to outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN27 of the Wealden Local Plan (1998)Spatial Planning Objectives SPO2 and SPO13 of the adopted Wealden District Local Plan (2013)Chapter 12 of the Wealden Design Guide SPD (2008)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wealden District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed23 October 20266011286
    37 High Street, Frant, TN3 9DT
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266010554
    Ivy House, Mayfield Road, Mark Cross, Rotherfield, TN6 3PJ
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266011082
    Willow Farm, Under Road, Herstmonceux, BN27 1QE
  4. Notice varied and upheld28 September 20263356589
    Land An New House Farm, Buckham Hill, Isfield, East Sussex, TN22 5XU
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266009517
    Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.