Planning appeal decision
15 Tame Crossing, WS10 0DT
a garage extension to the front of the dwelling
- Authority
- Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Eggleton P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect on the convenience and safety of all road users
What decided it
The loss of parking provision, albeit inconvenient, would further reduce legitimate parking options in an area already experiencing severe parking stress and would conflict with the SPD requirement for two parking spaces for a three-bedroom dwelling.
Framework references: 2023
Plan policies cited: Supplementary Planning Document: Revised Residential Design Guide 2014 Appendix 3, Policy ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011, Policy SAD EOS 9 of the Site Allocations and Delivery Development Plan Document 2012
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®