Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 July 20266008753

337-345 Halesowen Road, Cradley Heath, B64 6PH

Planning appeal 6008753 at 337-345 Halesowen Road, Cradley Heath, B64 6PH (Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 July 2026 by Inspector H Wilkinson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed first floor extension on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the roof design and external materials.

the retention of first floor extension to rear and dormer window to rear and proposed change of use of first floor E Class (storage) retail area including roof area to 4 No. new 1 and 2 bedroom flats

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
H Wilkinson
Postcode
B64 6PH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed first floor extension on the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the roof design and external materials
  • whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for the future occupants of Flat 4 with particular reference to internal headroom
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for cycle parking and bin storage

What decided it

The proposed first floor extension would harm the character and appearance of the area through poor roof design integration, and Flat 4 would fail to provide appropriate living conditions due to insufficient headroom compliance with space standards.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy 2011Policy SAD EOS9 of the Site Allocations and Delivery Plan Document 2012Policy HOU2 of the Core Strategy

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

44 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed24 August 20266009660
    6 Rooth Street, Wednesbury, WS10 9QP
  2. Dismissed21 August 20266007680
    32 Bell End, Rowley Regis, West Midlands, B65 9LR
  3. Allowed1 July 20266006966
    Trident Steel Works, Albion Road, Greets Green, Sandwell, B70 8BH
  4. Dismissed5 June 20266004458
    18 Unketts Road, Smethwick, B67 6RQ
  5. Allowed11 May 20266003538
    277 - 279 High Street, Smethwick, B66 3NJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.