Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld20 February 20253332337

Park Farm, Lurgashall, Petworth, GU28 9EU

Planning appeal 3332337 at Park Farm, Lurgashall, Petworth, GU28 9EU (Chichester District Council) was dismissed on 20 February 2025 by Inspector Hawkins S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether there is an essential need for the development, having regard to policies in the Development Plan and the Framework which seek to avoid isolated new homes in the countryside.

stationing of a mobile home in existing agricultural building

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Hawkins S
Postcode
GU28 9EU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether there is an essential need for the development, having regard to policies in the Development Plan and the Framework which seek to avoid isolated new homes in the countryside
  • Whether the landscape and scenic beauty of the South Downs National Park is conserved

What decided it

The absence of an essential need for permanent residential accommodation at the site, combined with unacceptable harm to the landscape and scenic beauty of the South Downs National Park, means the development conflicts with the Development Plan and there are no material considerations to outweigh this conflict.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD25Policy SD32Policy SD1Policy SD4Policy SD5Policy SD7Policy SD2Policy SD17
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 84Paragraph 15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chichester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Planning permission granted28 September 20263377990
    Thornham Products, Thornham Lane, Southbourne, Emsworth, West Sussex, PO10 8DD
  2. Notice varied and upheld7 August 20263358007
    Plot 2, First Acre, Ham Road, Sidlesham, West Sussex, PO20 7NS
  3. Dismissed5 August 20263371769
    Melita Nursery, Chalk Lane, Sidlesham, PO20 7LW
  4. Notice varied and upheld3 August 20263372472
    Littlemead Business Park, Tangmere Road, Tangmere, West Sussex, PO20 2EU
  5. Notice varied and upheld28 July 20263328291
    Grists Farm, Hunston, Chichester, PO20 1JL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.