Planning appeal decision
Thornham Products, Thornham Lane, Southbourne, Emsworth, West Sussex, PO10 8DD
Planning appeal 3377990 at Thornham Products, Thornham Lane, Southbourne, Emsworth, West Sussex, PO10 8DD (Chichester District Council) was allowed on 28 September 2026 by Inspector Franks Z, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is located in the countryside or in an unsustainable location.
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Franks Z
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is located in the countryside or in an unsustainable location
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, in particular the Chichester Harbour National Landscape and the adjacent public right of way
- Whether the development is at risk of flooding
- The effect of the development on the Chichester and Langstone Harbours Special Protection Area
- Whether the appellant meets the policy definition of gypsies and travellers
- Whether there is a need for and supply of gypsy and traveller pitches in the area
- Personal circumstances
- Best interests of the children and Human Rights
- Whether the development was intentional unauthorised development
- Planning Policy including the Development Plan and the 2026 NPPF
- Any other considerations
What decided it
A temporary ten-year permission was found to sufficiently reduce the flood risk conflict so that the benefits of meeting the unmet need for gypsy and traveller pitches and the occupants' personal circumstances substantially outweighed the adverse effects when assessed against the Framework's national decision-making policies.
the benefits of granting temporary permission would substantially outweigh the adverse affects, when assessed against the national decision-making policies of the Framework
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S2Policy H13Policy NE2Policy NE8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Policy S3Policy S5Policy HO12Policy F5Policy F6Policy F7
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Notice varied and upheld7 August 20263358007Plot 2, First Acre, Ham Road, Sidlesham, West Sussex, PO20 7NS
- Notice varied and upheld3 August 20263372472Littlemead Business Park, Tangmere Road, Tangmere, West Sussex, PO20 2EU
- Notice varied and upheld28 July 20263328291Grists Farm, Hunston, Chichester, PO20 1JL
- Dismissed15 June 2026334231995 First Avenue, Batchmere, Chichester, PO20 7LQ
- Split Decision23 March 20263346062Oxoncroft, Ifold Bridge Lane, Ifold, Loxwood, Billingshurst, RH14 0UJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®