Planning appeal decision
95 First Avenue, Batchmere, CHICHESTER, PO20 7LQ
described as ‘change of use of building to dwelling
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- King T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether, on the balance of probability, the use was lawful within the meaning of section 191(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
What decided it
The occupation of the building was intermittent and short-term rather than continuous, and the building remains ancillary to the main dwelling within the same planning unit rather than constituting an independent dwelling.
Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982]; Burdle v SSE [1972]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®