Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 June 20263342319

95 First Avenue, Batchmere, CHICHESTER, PO20 7LQ

described as ‘change of use of building to dwelling

Authority
Chichester District Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
King T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether, on the balance of probability, the use was lawful within the meaning of section 191(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990

What decided it

The occupation of the building was intermittent and short-term rather than continuous, and the building remains ancillary to the main dwelling within the same planning unit rather than constituting an independent dwelling.

Judgments cited: Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982]; Burdle v SSE [1972]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.