Planning appeal decision
Land off Fishbeck Lane, Silsden, West Yorkshire, BD20 0NR
Planning appeal 3332884 at Land off Fishbeck Lane, Silsden, West Yorkshire, BD20 0NR (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 10 May 2024 by Inspector Bust R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the landscape character and visual effects including the implications for tourism and recreation.
the re-opening of Horn Crag Quarry for the purposes of releasing a proven, locally distinctive building stone resource
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- minerals-waste · Mineral working
- Inspector
- Bust R
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the landscape character and visual effects including the implications for tourism and recreation
- The effect of the proposal on biodiversity including protected species
- The effect of the proposal on the groundwater and private water supply
What decided it
The significant and largely permanent harm to the character and visual amenity of a valued landscape outweighed the benefits of mineral supply and economic need.
the significant weight given to the supply of building stone and associated economic benefits was not sufficient to outweigh the substantial harm to landscape character and visual effects of a valued landscape, and the balance therefore tipped against the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SC7Saved Policy GB1Policy EN4Policy EN9(B)Policy EN9(3)Policy EN9(B3)Policy EN9(B4)Policy SWES5Policy DS2Policy EC4(F)Policy EN1Policy DS5Policy SWES6Policy EN2Policy EN9Policy EN10Policy EN10(B)Policy EN8(D)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155Paragraph 180Paragraph 104Paragraph 115Paragraph 55Paragraph 217
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE JPL 1982 P37
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed22 October 20266013460Overgate Croft Cottage, Cocking Lane, Addingham, LS29 0QG
- Dismissed20 October 20266012872Keepers Cottege, North Bank Road, Bingley, Bradford, BD16 1UH
- Dismissed15 September 20266008465Land at Moorhouse Lane, Oxenhope, Keighley, BD22 9RY
- Allowed10 August 20266002654Land Adjacent to Brackenwood, Hebers Ghyll Drive, Ilkley, LS29 9QQ
- Dismissed20 July 20266008285Ghyll Clough Farm, Slaymaker Lane, Oakworth, Bradford, BD22 7EH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®