Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 January 20243332971

21 Queens Drive, THAMES DITTON, KT7 0TJ

two storey front addition, widening existing historic addition; attic extension with new mansard roof

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Evans L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and on the local area
  • The effect of the proposal, with particular regard to the rear balcony / terrace on the living conditions of neighbours, including through overlooking and loss of privacy
  • The effect of the proposal on flood risk

What decided it

The substantial increase in height and massing of the proposed roof forms would result in a visually incongruous and intrusive property in the street scene, conflicting with policies requiring high quality design that respects local context.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: CS8, CS17, CS26, DM2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.