Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 July 20243333009

75 Cavendish Road, Colliers Wood, Merton, London, SW19 2EY

the demolition of existing bungalow and detached garage and erection of a 2-storey building with accommodation within roof space to create 7 self-contained flats (1 x 3 bed, 2 x 2 bed, 4 x 1 bed) with associated amenity space, cycle store and bin enclosure

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pearce J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupants of Nos 27-33 Norfolk Road, with regard to outlook
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to privacy
  • whether the proposed development would deliver biodiversity net gain

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants significantly and demonstrably outweighs the benefits of housing delivery, even under the tilted balance.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and to neighbouring living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies of the Framework as a whole, notwithstanding the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 11, 8

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy CS14, Policy DM D2, Policy T6, Policy G6

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd vs Secretary of State for the Environment [JPL, 1982, P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.