Planning appeal decision
Maidenhill House,, Horsemarling Lane, Stonehouse, GL10 3BZ
Planning appeal 3333115 at Maidenhill House,, Horsemarling Lane, Stonehouse, GL10 3BZ (Stroud District Council) was dismissed on 1 November 2024 by Inspector Reeves K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would accord with the strategy of the development plan for the location of tourist accommodation in the countryside.
Change of use from a domestic dwelling to sui generis holiday let
- Authority
- Stroud District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Change of use
- Inspector
- Reeves K
- Postcode
- GL10 3BZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would accord with the strategy of the development plan for the location of tourist accommodation in the countryside
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the Cotswolds National Landscape
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring residential property, the Coach House, having regard to privacy and noise
What decided it
The proposal's failure to accord with the development plan strategy for locating tourist accommodation in settlements and the unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the Cotswolds National Landscape outweighed the limited economic benefits.
the limited economic benefits of the holiday let use were outweighed by the identified conflict with the development plan and the associated harm to the character and appearance of the area and the Cotswolds National Landscape
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Core Policy CP15Delivery Policy EI10Policy CP1Policy CP3Policy CP14Policy ES7Policy ES3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 225Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Stroud
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 October 20266010245Bassett Court Farm, North Nibley, GL11 6DQ
- Allowed13 October 20266009483Land Northwest of Stonehouse, Grid Ref Easting: 379777. Grid Ref Northing: 207047, Stonehouse, Gl10 3WP
- Allowed5 October 20266007595Land at Epney, Framilode, Gloucester, GL27LL
- Allowed1 September 202660089245A Water Street, Dursley, GL11 4JG
- Allowed17 November 20253366140Land West of A4135 Draycott, Cam, GL11 5LN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®