Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 April 20243333223

21 Cherry Orchard, WEST DRAYTON, UB7 7JR

a single storey rear and two storey side extension

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones GP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and its surroundings
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of the adjoining dwelling at 23 Cherry Orchard with particular reference to visual impact, overshadowing and light

What decided it

The existence of a fall-back position (a similar scheme recently approved by the Council) and the minimal differences between the appeal scheme and that approved scheme, combined with the absence of material harm to character, appearance or neighbouring living conditions, justified allowing the appeal.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part One – Strategic Policies, Policy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, Policy DMHB 12 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, Policy DMHD 1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two – Development Management Policies, Policy D3 of the London Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.