Planning appeal decision
24 Fairfield Avenue, Datchet, Slough, SL3 9NQ
Planning appeal 3333352 at 24 Fairfield Avenue, Datchet, Slough, SL3 9NQ (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 11 October 2024 by Inspector Francis L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
for a new detached dwelling
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Francis L
- Postcode
- SL3 9NQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the appeal proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the appeal proposal on biodiversity
- the effect of the appeal proposal on carbon emissions
- the effect of the appeal proposal on highway safety
- the effect of the appeal proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to refuse and cycle storage
What decided it
The harm to character and appearance and to biodiversity would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of delivering a single additional dwelling when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.
The benefits of one additional dwelling and limited economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and to biodiversity, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply despite the Council's housing land supply shortfall.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP3Policy NR2Policy SP2Policy IF2Datchet Neighbourhood Plan 2022-2033 Policy DAT2Datchet Neighbourhood Plan 2022-2033 Policy DAT8Datchet Neighbourhood Plan 2022-2033 Policy DAT9Datchet Neighbourhood Plan 2022-2033 Policy DAT13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 July 20266008433Jones House, High Street, Bray, SL6 2AH
- Allowed15 July 20266005399Land South of Garden Cottage, Fifield Road, Fifield, SL6 2NZ
- Dismissed13 May 2026600317431 Temple Road, Windsor, SL4 1HP
- Dismissed11 March 202633717785 Llanvair Drive, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 9HS
- Dismissed10 March 20266002014Salon 227 227 Coppermill Road, Wraysbury, Staines, TW19 5NW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®