Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 September 20243333606

15 Leighton Road, Heath and Reach, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, LU7 0AA

Planning appeal 3333606 at 15 Leighton Road, Heath and Reach, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, LU7 0AA (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 3 September 2024 by Inspector Gee R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including its impact on openness, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

proposed dwelling to include removal of dilapidated barns

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gee R
Postcode
LU7 0AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including its impact on openness, having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Heath and Reach Conservation Area
  • whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building known as 13 and 15 Leighton Road
  • the effect of the proposed development on protected trees
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing moderate harm to openness, and the modest public benefits do not clearly outweigh this harm and the heritage harms, so very special circumstances do not exist.

The modest public benefits of housing delivery, self-build support, sustainability credentials and economic/social benefits do not outweigh the substantial weight attached to the moderate harm to Green Belt openness and the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets (Conservation Area and listed building setting), so the very special circumstances necessary to justify inappropriate Green Belt development do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy HE3Policy HQ8Policy HE1Policy EE4Policy EE5Policy EE8Policy H6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 154Paragraph 149
Judgments
Dartford Borough Council v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 141

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

12 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266009734
    Whitewood Corner, 7 Drove Road, Gamlingay, Sandy, SG19 2HT
  2. Allowed15 October 20266009682
    Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
  3. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  4. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
  5. Dismissed7 August 20266007254
    Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.