Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 October 20243333771

1 Catways, Hursley, Winchester, SO21 2JT

Planning appeal 3333771 at 1 Catways, Hursley, Winchester, SO21 2JT (Winchester City Council) was dismissed on 31 October 2024 by Inspector Rogers J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Hursley Conservation Area.

a new dwelling on garden land

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rogers J
Postcode
SO21 2JT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of the Hursley Conservation Area
  • the safety of users of Port Lane and Heathcote Place

What decided it

The proposed development conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly regarding character and appearance and highway safety, and there are no material considerations that would justify a decision contrary to the development plan.

The modest social, economic and environmental benefits of one additional dwelling in an area with a five-year housing supply were outweighed by the harm to character and appearance and highway safety, resulting in conflict with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP13 of the LPP1Policy CP10 of the LPP1Policy DM15 of the LPP2Policy DM16 of the LPP2Policy DM17 of the LPP2Policy DM18 of the LPP2Policy DM1 of the LPP2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Winchester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012051
    Cupressus, Durley Brook Road, Southampton, SO32 2AR
  2. Dismissed14 October 20266011078
    Oakridge, Biddenfield Lane, Shedfield, SO32 2HP
  3. Allowed10 August 20266005547
    Land at Lower Paddock, Bent Lane, Hambledon, PO7 4QP
  4. Dismissed3 August 20266004233
    3, Farm Cottages, Knowle, PO17 5LZ
  5. Allowed29 July 20266005463
    62 Downs Road,, South Wonston,, Winchester, SO21 3EW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.