Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 October 20243333910

5 Preston Lane, Allerton Bywater, Castleford, WF10 2HQ

Planning appeal 3333910 at 5 Preston Lane, Allerton Bywater, Castleford, WF10 2HQ (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 22 October 2024 by Inspector Kempton N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the area.

alterations including two-storey rear extension with Juliet balcony; two-storey side extension with integral garage; single-storey infill extension to link the new extensions; single storey front extension; roof space converted to habitable rooms with rooflight to front

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Kempton N
Postcode
WF10 2HQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the area
  • effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at number 3 Preston Lane with particular regard to external amenity area and outlook

What decided it

The disproportionate scale, massing and transverse gable roof form of the proposed extensions would be unduly dominating and visually intrusive, causing unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the host building and area, and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, which could not be outweighed by the fallback positions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
P10BD6GP5BD5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012772
    Lovell Park Hub, Wintoun Street, Leeds, LS7 1DA
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266012588
    Index House, 70 Burley Road, Leeds, LS3 1JX
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266012022
    5 Robins Grove, Rothwell, Leeds, LS26 0LE
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266010100
    Vacant Site, Ings Grove, Guiseley, LS20 9FR
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266010414
    Ground Floor, 106 Burley Road, Burley, Leeds, LS3 1JP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.