Planning appeal decision
Kilnwood Vale Sub-Phase 3DEFG, Kilnwood Vale, Crawley Road, Faygate, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 0DB
Planning appeal 3333968 at Kilnwood Vale Sub-Phase 3DEFG, Kilnwood Vale, Crawley Road, Faygate, Horsham, West Sussex, RH12 0DB (Horsham District Council) was allowed on 30 July 2024 by Inspector McCreery D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether a Habitats Regulations compliant appropriate assessment can be concluded and, if so, on what basis.
reserved matters approval sought for layout, appearance, landscaping, and scale (in accordance with DC/15/2813) for Phase 3DEFG of the Kilnwood Vale development, comprising 280 dwellings with associated landscaping, access and parking. Summary of recommendation: the reserved matters should be APPROVED. 1
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- McCreery D
- Postcode
- RH12 0DB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether a Habitats Regulations compliant appropriate assessment can be concluded and, if so, on what basis.
- Whether the evidence otherwise indicates that the reserved matters should be approved.
What decided it
The imposition of a Grampian-style condition (Condition 6) securing water neutrality mitigation via SNOWS or an equivalent scheme enabled a favourable Habitats Regulations appropriate assessment to be concluded.
The significant benefits of housing, affordable housing, employment, economic benefits, open space, landfill remediation and biodiversity, combined with accordance with the Outline Permission and development plan, outweighed the need for further restriction, once conditions ensured no adverse effect on the integrity of the Arun Valley Sites.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 31Policy 32Policy 33Policy 37Policy 40Policy 41Policy WB1Policy WB4Policy WB10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 56Paragraph 60Paragraph 74Paragraph 180Paragraph 186Paragraph 187Paragraph 188Paragraph 194Paragraph 20
- Judgments
- Wyatt [2023]; Waddenzee; Sweetman; R (An Taisce); Sizewell C; Harris [2023]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Horsham District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266008830Staalcot Farm Stall House Lane, Stall House Lane, North Heath, RH20 2HR
- Allowed12 October 20266011680Land at High Chaparral, London Road, Washington, RH20 3BP
- Allowed25 September 20266010268Priory Field Barn, Monastery Lane, Storrington, RH20 4LN
- Allowed24 September 20266007772The Lamb Inn, Lambs Green, Rusper, RH12 4RG
- Allowed10 September 20266009593Land East of Spring Gardens, Washington, RH20 3BP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®