Planning appeal decision
Land North of Raleigh Drive, Claygate , Esher , Surrey, KT10 9DF
Planning appeal 3334391 at Land North of Raleigh Drive, Claygate , Esher , Surrey, KT10 9DF (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 May 2024 by Inspector McGlone A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy of the development plan.
an outline planning application for up to 60 dwellings, associated landscaping and open space with access from Raleigh Drive
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- McGlone A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would accord with the spatial strategy of the development plan
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt, and the purposes of including the land within it
- whether the Council can demonstrate a four-year supply of deliverable housing sites
- whether the proposal would make adequate provision for affordable housing, biodiversity net gain, highway improvement schemes and a car club
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The other considerations, including housing and affordable housing benefits, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm attributed to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
The substantial weight attached to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, limited openness harm and conflict with purpose c) was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (market and affordable housing, BNG, economic and recreational benefits), so very special circumstances did not exist and the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy CS11Policy CS15Policy CS21Policy CS25Policy CS26DMP Policy DM7DMP Policy DM21DMP Policy DM17DMP Policy DM1eLP Policy HOU4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 137Paragraph 226Paragraph 77Paragraph 57Paragraph 85Paragraph 153
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed7 August 202660049854, Felix Lane, Shepperton Surrey, TW17 8NJ
- Dismissed16 July 20266007665Whitewood, Redhill Road, Cobham, KT11 1EF
- Dismissed29 June 20266007101The Cottage, Byfleet Road, Cobham, KT111DS
- Dismissed4 June 20266006584Hillsway, Downside Common Road,, Downside, Cobham, KT11 3NP
- Dismissed9 March 20263356517Silvermere Golf Club, Redhill Road, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 1EF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®