Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 September 20243334852

Land East Of Wood Lane, Wood Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7RQ

Planning appeal 3334852 at Land East Of Wood Lane, Wood Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7RQ (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 26 September 2024 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

described on the application form as, “erection 5 no. dwellinghouses”

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
BS20 7RQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the locational strategy in the development plan and the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The proposed development would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with harms that are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and the very special circumstances required to justify it do not exist.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to openness, unsuitability of location, and harm to character and appearance, were not clearly outweighed by the limited positive impacts in economic, social and environmental terms, including the contribution to housing supply and economic benefits, which were given no more than moderate weight.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM12Policy CS6Policy CS14Policy CS33Policy CS1Policy CS32Policy SA2Policy CS13Policy CS5Policy CS12Policy DM10Policy DM32Policy DM37
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 70Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
Judgments
Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham BC [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin), [2015] EWCA Civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Somerset Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed9 October 20266011867
    Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007743
    Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
  3. Dismissed8 June 20266006387
    Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
  4. Dismissed11 November 20253366314
    Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
  5. Dismissed26 September 20253365815
    Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.