Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 September 20243334852

Land East Of Wood Lane, Wood Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7RQ

described on the application form as, “erection 5 no. dwellinghouses”

Authority
North Somerset Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
O'Doherty A
Postcode
BS20 7RQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development, with particular regard to whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the locational strategy in the development plan and the accessibility of services and facilities
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The proposed development would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with harms that are not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and the very special circumstances required to justify it do not exist.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to openness, unsuitability of location, and harm to character and appearance, were not clearly outweighed by the limited positive impacts in economic, social and environmental terms, including the contribution to housing supply and economic benefits, which were given no more than moderate weight.

Framework references: 11, 70, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DM12, Policy CS6, Policy CS14, Policy CS33, Policy CS1, Policy CS32, Policy SA2, Policy CS13, Policy CS5, Policy CS12, Policy DM10, Policy DM32, Policy DM37

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham BC [2014] EWHC 683 (Admin), [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.