Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 April 20243334879

5 Acacia Park Drive, Rawdon, Bradford, BD10 0PL

construction of retaining wall, alterations to driveway/ garden, and installation of gates (retrospective)

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Caines A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • Whether the development has preserved or enhanced the character or appearance of the Rawdon-Cragg Wood Conservation Area and surrounding landscape
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that fails to preserve openness, and causes harm to the Conservation Area that is not outweighed by the limited benefits offered.

Framework references: 155, 154, 12, 15, 16

Plan policies cited: Policy N33, Policy P10, Policy P11, Policy P12, Policy GP5, Policy N19, Policy N37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.