Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 February 20243335049

24 Hainworth, Keighley, BD21 5QH

part single part two storey extension to rear

Authority
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Wilson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, having regard to whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hainworth Conservation Area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate very special circumstances that would clearly outweigh the identified harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area.

Framework references: 154, 142, 205, 206, 208

Plan policies cited: DS1, DS3, EN3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.