Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to Weavers Park, Bocking End, Braintree, Essex, CM7 9AA
Planning appeal 3335393 at Land Adjacent to Weavers Park, Bocking End, Braintree, Essex, CM7 9AA (Braintree District Council) was dismissed on 5 July 2024 by Inspector Wright Y, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area, particularly in regard to the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, John Ray House, the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Braintree Town Centre Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of a non-designated heritage asset, Tabor House.
erection of 22 residential apartments with associated access, parking and amenity area
- Authority
- Braintree District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wright Y
- Postcode
- CM7 9AA
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area, particularly in regard to the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, John Ray House, the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Braintree Town Centre Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of a non-designated heritage asset, Tabor House
- Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring residents
- Whether the proposal would provide adequate car parking
- The effect of the proposal on open space provision
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building and conservation area was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme, and this heritage harm combined with harm to living conditions, parking and open space led to dismissal.
The public benefits of the scheme (reuse of an unused car park, market and affordable housing, biodiversity net gain and economic benefits) did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the designated heritage assets, nor the harm to living conditions, parking provision and open space, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LPP47Policy LPP57Policy LPP53Policy SP7Policy LPP52Policy LPP35Policy LPP43Policy LPP50
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 139Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Braintree District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed12 October 202660127499 Kemsley Road, Earls Colne, CO6 2NU
- Dismissed21 January 20263366289Broadfields Nursery, Broad Road, Braintree, CM7 5NJ
- Allowed6 November 20253369428Windyridge, Chapel End Way, Stambourne, Halstead, CO9 4NX
- Dismissed14 October 20253366906Land Rear of 5 Butler Road, Leather Lane, Great Yeldham, Essex, CO9 4JB
- Dismissed28 May 20253352260Land North West Of Maltbeggars Farm, Tey Road, Coggeshall, Essex, CO6 1SD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®