Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 March 20243335672

35 King Street, Drighlington, BRADFORD, BD11 1EJ

covered seating area to front and rear with covered walkway to side

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Clowes M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host building and wider area
  • The living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to noise and disturbance, and odour

What decided it

The proposed front gazebo would cause unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the host building and wider area, and all proposed structures would cause significant and harmful impacts on neighbouring residents' living conditions through noise, disturbance and odour, conflicting with the development plan with no material considerations to outweigh this conflict.

Framework references: 191

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy 2014, Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan, Review 2006, Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan, Review 2006, Policy BD5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan, Review 2006

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.