Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20243335808

50, 52, 54 Stanhope Road, Highgate, London, N6 5AL

Erection of two semi-detached two-bedroom houses, parking and associate infrastructure on the Alford House Site

Authority
London Borough of Haringey
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Edginton A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Highgate Conservation Area (HCA)
  • The effects of the development on the living conditions of existing occupiers with particular regard to light and outlook, and for future occupiers with regard to light and internal space
  • Whether the development would accord with local policies with regard to parking stress and sustainable transport options

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the designated heritage asset (Highgate Conservation Area) and to living conditions of existing and future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweighed the minor benefit of two additional dwellings in an area with no demonstrable five-year housing supply.

The minor benefit of two additional dwellings to local housing supply and associated economic benefits was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to designated heritage assets and living conditions, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 16

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1, Policy D3, Policy D6, Policy DM9, Policy SP12, Policy SP11, Policy DM1, Policy DM12, Policy DM7, Policy DM31, Policy DM32, Policy SP7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.