Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 March 20243335845

17 Rutland Close, Woodlesford, Leeds, LS26 8LL

a two-storey side extension

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morgan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposed extension would appear as an unattractive, contrived addition due to its angled form, overhanging roof and unbalanced fenestration, causing harm to the character and appearance of the area and conflicting with the development plan and NPPF.

Framework references: 135

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Core Strategy (amended 2019), saved Policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan 2006, saved UDP Policy GP5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.