Planning appeal decision
St. George's Gardens South, St. George's Business Park, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0RH
Planning appeal 3336023 at St. George's Gardens South, St. George's Business Park, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 0RH (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 June 2024 by Inspector Davies G, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The character and appearance of the area (appeals A, B and C).
the demolition of 2no. existing office (Class E) buildings (Blocks A and B) and the erection of 168no. apartments (mix of 1-, 2- and 3-beds) across 4no. blocks (ranging from 3-6 storeys) and 18no. houses (mix of 3- and 4-beds) with associated basement and surface level car and bicycle parking, resident amenities and hard and soft landscaping with all necessary ancillary and enabling works
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Davies G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The character and appearance of the area (appeals A, B and C)
- Living conditions of future occupants, with respect to size and function of garden areas (appeals A and B), and light and aspect (appeal C)
- Retention of existing trees (appeals A and C) and potential for new landscaping (appeal A)
What decided it
The poor design of the town houses backing onto Brooklands Road, causing harm to character/appearance and living conditions, outweighed the housing and other benefits in appeals A and B, whereas appeal C's accordance with the development plan led to it being allowed.
For appeals A and B, the conflict with the development plan, in particular the poor design layout, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits including housing delivery, economic and environmental benefits; for appeal C, with no conflict with the development plan and no adverse material considerations, the balance favoured the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy CS4Policy CS17Policy DM2Policy DM10Policy DM6Policy CS14Policy CS25Policy CS13Policy CS21Policy CS15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 77Paragraph 139Paragraph 226
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 2026601339623 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
- Dismissed21 October 2026601332769 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
- Dismissed16 October 20266008605Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Dismissed16 October 20266008598Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Allowed14 October 20266009254Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®