Planning appeal decision
Land Adj. Melathron, Quarry Road, Godstone, RH9 8DQ
Planning appeal 3336051 at Land Adj. Melathron, Quarry Road, Godstone, RH9 8DQ (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 16 July 2024 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework.
the demolition of existing outbuildings, and removal of storage container, and the erection of a contemporary style dwelling
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- RH9 8DQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the Framework
- Whether the proposal would preserve the settings of the Grade II listed buildings known as Quarry Farm House and The Barn
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify it
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with marked harm to the settings and significance of the listed buildings, was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply and economic contribution.
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and harm to openness, together with the considerable weight given to less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets, was not outweighed by the moderate benefits of housing supply, economic and social benefits, and biodiversity enhancement, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP20
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 152Paragraph 153
- Judgments
- R (oao Heath and Hampstead Society) v Camden LBC [2007] EWCA Civ 193
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®