Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 July 20243336349

Derelict Lock-up Garage Block, Land Between 7/8 and 9/10 Tanhouse Lane, Wokingham, RG41 2RL

Planning appeal 3336349 at Derelict Lock-up Garage Block, Land Between 7/8 and 9/10 Tanhouse Lane, Wokingham, RG41 2RL (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 3 July 2024 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

the construction of 2No. 2 bedroom flats and 2 No. 1 bedroom flats over carports and parking

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Ellis G
Postcode
RG41 2RL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on flood risk
  • the effect of the development on protected species and biodiversity

What decided it

The failure to satisfy the sequential test for flood risk, combined with unresolved impacts on character and appearance and protected species, meant the proposal could not be considered sustainable development and did not accord with the development plan.

The benefits of brownfield reuse and housing contribution were outweighed by the harm to character and appearance, the failure to satisfy the sequential flood risk test, and unresolved biodiversity impacts; the tilted balance did not apply due to footnote 7 of paragraph 11 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP1CP3CP7CC01CC09CC10CC03TB23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 124Paragraph 168Paragraph 173

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

81 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 July 20266008845
    Pound Lane Cottage, Pound Lane, Hurst, RG10 0RS
  2. Dismissed9 March 20263361360
    Land West of Limmerhill Road, Wokingham, RG41 4BY
  3. Allowed2 February 20263375029
    1 Halstead Close, Woodley, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG5 4LD
  4. Allowed26 November 20253363174
    178 Bearwood Road, Barkham, Wokingham, RG41 4SH
  5. Dismissed27 October 20253364902
    Land East of Warren Lodge, Warren Lane, Finchampstead, RG40 4HR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.