Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 October 20243336396

Sandfold, Common Lane, Selmeston, Polegate, East Sussex, BN26 6SX

Planning appeal 3336396 at Sandfold, Common Lane, Selmeston, Polegate, East Sussex, BN26 6SX (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 28 October 2024 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing.

a single self-build dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
BN26 6SX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be in a suitable location for housing
  • the effect of the proposal on flood risk
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species

What decided it

The harm identified with regard to flood risk, as an area at risk of flooding listed in footnote 7 to paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, provided a clear reason for refusing the development and prevented the presumption in favour of sustainable development from applying.

The benefits of the proposal, including the provision of a single dwelling contributing to housing supply and the self-build nature of the development, were not sufficient to outweigh the harm identified regarding location suitability, flood risk, and protected species impact, particularly given that flood risk provided a clear reason for refusal under the tilted balance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy GD2Policy DC17Policy WSC6Policy WCS6Policy SPO7Policy SPO8Policy WCS12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

15 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wealden District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed25 September 20266009517
    Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN
  2. Dismissed14 April 20266003970
    Little Warren Barn, The Warren, Crowborough, East Sussex, TN6 1UB
  3. Dismissed27 January 20263370047
    Hedera Cottage North Street, Punnetts Town, Heathfield, TN21 9DT
  4. Dismissed22 January 20263372124
    Birch Holt, Marlpits Lane, Ninfield, East Sussex, TN33 9LD
  5. Allowed31 December 20253366478
    Snatchells Farm, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0LS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.