Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 June 20243336578

Thorston Medical Centre, Grass verge of Hart Lane, Thorston Grange, Hartlepool, TS26 0XP

Authority
Hartlepool Borough Council *
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Symmons J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and, if any harm would occur, whether this would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that suitable less harmful alternative sites do not exist, and the visual harm to character and appearance from the proposal's prominent siting was not outweighed by the need for the installation in the location proposed.

Framework references: 11, 38, 85, 118, 119, 120, 122, 131, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy INF5, Policy QP4, Policy QP6, Policy SUS1, Policy INF1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.