Planning appeal decision
Steads Yard, Roker Lane, Pudsey, Leeds, LS28 9NE
Planning appeal 3336650 at Steads Yard, Roker Lane, Pudsey, Leeds, LS28 9NE (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 12 March 2024 by Inspector Wraight G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
a 1st floor side extension
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Wraight G
- Postcode
- LS28 9NE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative effect of the proposed extension with previous extensions already constructed would constitute disproportionate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and no very special circumstances were demonstrated to justify this harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006Policy HDG3 of the Council's Householder Design Guide 2012
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®