Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 March 20243336650

Steads Yard, Roker Lane, Pudsey, Leeds, LS28 9NE

a 1st floor side extension

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Wraight G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative effect of the proposed extension with previous extensions already constructed would constitute disproportionate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and no very special circumstances were demonstrated to justify this harm.

Framework references: 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy HDG3 of the Council's Householder Design Guide 2012

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.