Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20243337212

5 Keats Road, Larkfield, Aylesford, ME20 6TP

Planning appeal 3337212 at 5 Keats Road, Larkfield, Aylesford, ME20 6TP (Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council) was dismissed on 12 December 2024 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

construction of a two storey, two bedroom end of terrace dwelling, together with ancillary cycle stores and bin collection facilities

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Pattison B
Postcode
ME20 6TP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular reference to the adequacy of the outdoor amenity space, privacy and outlook

What decided it

The harm to character and appearance caused by the dwelling's cramped siting, looming presence, and lack of meaningful landscaping, combined with the irregular plot layout, was found to be so significant that it outweighed the benefits of delivering an additional housing unit in a location with an acknowledged housing land supply shortfall.

The benefits of housing delivery and use of a windfall site within a settlement were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the importance of achieving well-designed places, such that the adverse impacts demonstrably outweighed the benefits and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CP1CP24SQ1PA4/12
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tonbridge and Malling

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed29 September 20266010459
    Land West of 103 Tonbridge Road, Hildenborough, TN11 9HL
  2. Dismissed29 September 20266009847
    The Old Stables, 12 Kenward Court, Hadlow, Tonbridge, TN11 0DX
  3. Dismissed8 July 20266007841
    Land Adjoining Hazeldene, Pilgrims Way, Trottiscliffe, West Malling, ME19 5EW
  4. Dismissed1 July 20266002496
    Old Allens, Allens Lane, Plaxtol, Sevenoaks, TN15 0QZ
  5. Dismissed18 June 20266004481
    Elpatos, Pilgrims Way, West Malling, ME19 5EP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.