Planning appeal decision
133 Clevedon Road, Tickenham, Clevedon, BS21 6RF
Planning appeal 3337219 at 133 Clevedon Road, Tickenham, Clevedon, BS21 6RF (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 20 September 2024 by Inspector Rose C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the Framework.
demolition of existing dwellinghouse and erection of replacement dwelling
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rose C
- Postcode
- BS21 6RF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the development plan and the Framework
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on trees within the site
- if it is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal would be materially larger than the existing dwelling by reason of its greater bulk, height, scale and massing, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, given substantial weight, was not clearly outweighed by minor weight afforded to increased family accommodation, limited social and economic benefits, and a fallback position with uncertain implementation prospects.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS6CS33DM12DM44CS4CS5CS9CS12DM8DM9DM10DM32
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin); Tandridge DC v SSLCG & Syrett [2015] EHWC 2503
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Somerset Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed9 October 20266011867Fairoaks, Cadbury Camp Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, BS20 7SA
- Dismissed6 August 20266007743Former BT Radio Research Laboratory, Long Lane, Backwell, BS48 3DE
- Dismissed8 June 20266006387Pump House, Land off Kingston Lane, Winford, Bristol, BS40 8DA
- Dismissed11 November 20253366314Land to Southeast of Wood Lane, Clapton in Gordano, BS20 7RQ
- Dismissed26 September 20253365815Land to South of Orchard Lee, 7 Backwell Hill Road, Backwell, BS48 3PL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®