Rydal Oaks, Cobham Road, Bookham, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 3QL

Planning appeal 3337285 at Rydal Oaks, Cobham Road, Bookham, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 3QL (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 14 October 2024 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

the erection of a replacement detached house following demolition of non-agricultural outbuildings. Amendment to residential curtilage

Authority: Mole Valley District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Phillips B
Postcode: KT11 3QL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
the effect of the proposal on protected species
if the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would materially increase the size of buildings and harm openness, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify approval.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy CS1Policy CS15Policy RUD8Policy ENV15
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 11Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

63 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Dismissed20 October 20266013764
Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
Dismissed19 October 20266011465
Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
Dismissed16 September 20266008528
Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
Allowed11 September 20266012763
Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
Dismissed9 September 20266005433
Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.