Planning appeal decision
Hartbank, Hartburn, Morpeth, Northumberland , NE61 4JB
Planning appeal 3337803 at Hartbank, Hartburn, Morpeth, Northumberland , NE61 4JB (Northumberland County Council) was dismissed on 8 July 2024 by Inspector Johnson W, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the construction of a two-bedroom detached eco-home (self-build), with solar panels
- Authority
- Northumberland County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Johnson W
- Postcode
- NE61 4JB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the site location is otherwise suitable for residential development, having regard to development plan policy governing proposals within the open countryside
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and surrounding area
- The effect of the proposed development on the setting of Hartburn Bridge, which is Grade II Listed
- Whether the proposed development would promote sustainable travel and provide safe access and egress for all modes of transport
- The effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness, combined with harm to character and appearance, heritage setting, and highway safety, was not clearly outweighed by the appellant's personal circumstances or other considerations, meaning very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STP 7Policy STP 8Policy STP 1Policy HOU 7Policy HOU 8Policy HOU 9Policy QOP 1Policy QOP 4Policy ENV 3Policy ENV 4Policy ENV 2Policy ENV 7Policy TRA 1Policy TRA 2Policy TRA 4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 142Paragraph 154Paragraph 180Paragraph 186Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Northumberland County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 20266011490Land North West of Ivy Cottage, Whittonstall, DH8 9JN
- Dismissed16 October 2026601049113 Park Drive, Hepscott Park, Morpeth, NE61 6QA
- Dismissed13 October 20266009232Land East of Monks Lodge, Mitford, NE61 2YJ
- Dismissed29 September 202660126272 Dilston West Cottages, Corbridge, NE45 5RL
- Allowed9 September 20266007219Breckon Hill, Lowgate, Hexham, NE46 2NL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®