Folly Cottage, 2 Rose Lane, Elmswell, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP30 9EB

Planning appeal 3337813 at Folly Cottage, 2 Rose Lane, Elmswell, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, IP30 9EB (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 8 July 2024 by Inspector Dring G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling and the occupiers of Folly Cottage, with regard to the amount of outdoor amenity space.

severance of garden and erection of 1 No. two storey detached dwelling with associated parking (amended scheme under refusal notice reference DC/22/02447)

Authority: Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector: Dring G
Postcode: IP30 9EB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed dwelling and the occupiers of Folly Cottage, with regard to the amount of outdoor amenity space
the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Eastbury with regard to privacy
the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole due to inadequate outdoor amenity space, unacceptable privacy harm to neighbours, and harmful effects on the character and appearance of the area, with no material considerations indicating a decision other than in accordance with the development plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Policy LP24

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

25 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Dismissed15 October 20266012038
The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
Dismissed14 September 20266010281
1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
Dismissed8 September 20266010228
Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
Dismissed2 September 20263359620
Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.